0
1
Executive Summary & Vision
The Colabonate Wallet is more than a key manager; it is the decentralized interface between the User, the functional Modules (Trade, Ticket System), and the structural Governance layers (DAO, Codex).
Its vision is to merge military-grade cryptographic security, provided by SSI and ZK-Proofs, with functional accessibility required for seamless interaction with RSK-based smart contracts and off-chain processes. The Wallet acts as the Personal Trust Anchor, authorizing every state change, vote, and asset transfer, ensuring all actions are compliant with the Colabonate Codex.
2
Functional Core Model
The Wallet architecture defines persistence and control over all core Colabonate assets and credentials.
2.1
Logical Architecture
- Identity Binding: Fundamentally tied to a Decentralized Identifier (DID), secured by user-controlled private keys. Key management must support advanced recovery schemes (Social Recovery/MPC) compliant with the HID/PP Protocol.
- Asset Management: The Wallet is the secure vault for:
- Native/External Tokens: COLA Token, RBTC, L2 native tokens.
- Reputation Units: Storage/Reference for Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) representing verified Reputation Scores.
- DAO Stakes: Holding governance stake/voting power proof.
- Digital Assets: NFTs representing ownership derived from Ticket completion (e.g., ownership proofs after a trade).
- Proof Carrier: The Wallet hosts and manages all Verifiable Credentials (VCs) and serves as the primary agent for generating cryptographic proofs required by other modules (MLAC, Context-Based Authentication).
2.2
Persistence
Wallet state and keys must conform to a DID-centric model. Sensitive material (private keys, seed phrases) must be protected by hardware/software security modules, while credential metadata and Public Keys are anchored or referenced via DIDs on the RSK Blockchain (Layer 1).
3
Protocol & Transaction Layer
This layer manages all interaction protocols between the Wallet and the broader Colabonate infrastructure (Blockchain/APIs).
3.1
Interaction and Signature Protocols
- RSK Smart Contract Interaction: Wallet must sign transactions targeting RSK contracts (e.g., Escrow release, Token transfer confirmation).
- L2 Channel Management: Secure signing interface for state transitions in off-chain/side-chain environments (e.g., confirmation of state updates leading to channel settlement).
- DAO Voting Authorization: The Wallet generates the cryptographic signature required to submit a vote payload (
vote(proposalId, payload)) according to the Codex §1.1. - Multi-Signature (Multi-Sig): Must support Multi-Sig schemes specific to organizational wallets or high-value DAO treasury operations, requiring co-signer consensus before broadcast.
3.2
Transaction Provenance and Audit Trails
Every action initiated by the Wallet must generate an immutable log artifact.
- Provenance Protocol: Every signed transaction payload must include a reference or hash linking it back to the initiating Workflow Instance ID and the specific Protocol version it satisfied.
- Audit Trail Generation: The Wallet acts as the source for generating a chronological, verifiable log (Transaction Provenance Record), essential for compliance and internal troubleshooting within the Observation Layer.
4
Identity & Security Integration
The Wallet is the mandatory carrier of the Human Identity (HID) and the mechanism for contextual verification.
4.1
Integration of SI & Proximity Proof
The Wallet must facilitate the interaction required by the Identity Protocol:
- Multi-Level Access Control (MLAC): Wallet policies must enforce Role Tokens derived from DAO membership or validated status. Access to high-privilege functions (e.g., setting high transaction limits) requires specific VCs or PP attestations.
- Context-Based Authentication: The Wallet enables the generation of runtime proofs (like Proximity Proof required for high-value Escrow release or DAO participation) by securely interfacing with contextual hardware (location, device signature) while preserving privacy via ZKPs.
- Peer-Level Validation: Enables cryptographic challenges/responses based on shared VCs for direct peer verification without external authorization.
4.2
Wallet as Proof Carrier
The Wallet is the custodian and presenter for all identity proofs required by the Compliance Layer. It selectively exposes credentials only when the context defined by the running Workflow permits such disclosure.
5
Functional Modules & Extensions
The Wallet acts as the unified interaction point for these specialized feature modules:
- Reputation Submodule: Securely stores the DID-bound SBTs. Wallet interface shows the dynamic Reputation Score and allows users to pledge reputation stakes for governance/mediation roles.
- Governance Submodule: Contains a dedicated interface to view active CIPs (Codex Improvement Proposals), manage delegations, and sign/submit votes (as per Codex §1.1). This interface must clearly display the Snapshot Block relevant for the current vote epoch.
- Escrow Manager: Directly linked to the Ticket System lifecycle. Wallet displays held assets in escrow and requires explicit authorization (often Multi-Sig or PP-gated) to trigger fund release or dispute initiation based on ticket status.
- Automation Layer Trigger: Wallet must support secure communication with external services (like
n8n-MCP-API) via standardized, authorized requests, allowing for automated workflow approvals upon meeting pre-defined Wallet conditions (e.g., „If Reputation > R_MIN and Token Balance > S_MIN, approve Workflow X setup“). - Notification Layer: Wallet must receive and cryptographically verify security-relevant notifications (e.g., „New Arbitrator Selected,“ „Key Use Attempt Detected“) originating from the Protocol Layer.
6
User Interaction & Developer Interface
6.1
User Interface (UI/UX)
- Web3/Mobile Integration: Must be wallet-agnostic (supporting MetaMask on RSK, and future mobile wallet standards). Clear, low-friction onboarding that simplifies complexity (e.g., auto-handling of initial gas fee ETH/RBTC requirements).
- Transaction Flow: Use clear, multi-step confirmations for any on-chain operation, displaying the execution cost, the recipient contract address, and the expected state change before final signature.
8
Dependency Mapping
The Wallet is the nexus point. It depends on protocols to define rules and feeds information back to enforce them.
| Dependency | Wallet Role | Input From Wallet | Output To Wallet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Human Identity (HID) / Proximity Proof | Custodian of Keys/Proofs | Generates PP/ZKP on demand. | Receives updated DID/VC status. |
| DAO Governance | Authorization Agent | Signs Proposals, Casts Votes. | Receives Snapshot data; Receives Mandates for protocol updates. |
| Ticket System | Transaction Trigger | Authorizes execute(ticket_id) transactions (e.g., Escrow release). |
Reports Ticket status changes affecting asset movement. |
| Reputation Engine | Proof Holder | Presents SBT/Reputation proofs. | Receives updated Reputation Scores/Badges. |
| Protocol & Workflow Engine | Execution Gatekeeper | Validates and signs Workflow Execution Bundles against Protocols. | Receives Protocol version mandates and Workflow status updates. |
6.2
Developer Interface
- Internal API Structure: Define a clean, documented internal API exposing capabilities like
sign_transaction(payload),verify_proof(type, proof_data), andget_active_vcs(). - CLI/SDK: Provide a robust Colabonate Wallet SDK (JavaScript/TypeScript focused initially) enabling developers to build dApps and specialized Workflows that integrate Wallet authorization seamlessly. This SDK must support creating transaction bundles signed by the Wallet for complex, multi-step Protocol executions.
7
Technical Architecture Summary
This summarizes the technology stack governing the Wallet’s operations:
- On-Chain: RSK Smart Contracts handle ownership, Escrow logic, Reputation Anchoring (SBT minting), and DAO voting execution.
- Off-Chain: Encrypted Data Layer (utilizing IPFS/Arweave for VC metadata) securely stores non-critical but context-rich data required for Proximity Proofs and MLAC profiling.
- Hybrid-Security: Heavy reliance on State Channels for high-frequency L2 micro-interactions, coupled with ZK-Proofs for privacy-preserving transactions and selective credential disclosure.
- Automation Integration: Direct interface hooks into the n8n-MCP-API Layer must be privileged for automated tasks authorized by the Wallet owner/DAO mandate.
